Re: Responses to Comments GK-1, DBeckett-1, and JB-4

On 2011-04-26, at 19:08, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 26/04/11 17:39, Steve Harris wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm waiting for confirmation on the following comment responses:
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:GK-1
> 
> Generally fine.  We need to close ISSUE-66 before LC.  Suggest removing direct reference to the issue.

Done, I also tweaked the working a little.

>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DBeckett-1
> 
> (minor)
> Re: II
> Maybe link to the explicit order.

Good idea, done.

> Re: III.
> """
> The group has not yet decided if BINDINGS will be usable outside of a federated query.
> """
> yes we have and yes it is :-)
> A WHERE clause is necessary, this is legal:
> 
> SELECT * {} BINDINGS ?var1 ?var2  {
>  ( "var1-value1"  "var2-value1" )
>  ( "var1-value2"  "var2-value2" )
> }

Not necessary, or not legal?

>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JB-4
> 
> s/defintion/definition/
> s/sancions/sanctions/

Thanks.

> and I agree, in fact there is no concept of precision in XSD decimals
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#decimal
> There is a minimum number of 18 decimal digits.

Right.

- Steve

>> Corresponding to ACTION-322, ACTION-340, and ACTION-401.
>> 
>> - Steve
>> 
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:03:13 UTC