W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Responses to Comments GK-1, DBeckett-1, and JB-4

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:08:06 +0100
Message-ID: <4DB70A06.60903@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org


On 26/04/11 17:39, Steve Harris wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm waiting for confirmation on the following comment responses:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:GK-1

Generally fine.  We need to close ISSUE-66 before LC.  Suggest removing 
direct reference to the issue.

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DBeckett-1

(minor)
Re: II
Maybe link to the explicit order.

Re: III.
"""
The group has not yet decided if BINDINGS will be usable outside of a 
federated query.
"""
yes we have and yes it is :-)
A WHERE clause is necessary, this is legal:

SELECT * {} BINDINGS ?var1 ?var2  {
   ( "var1-value1"  "var2-value1" )
   ( "var1-value2"  "var2-value2" )
}

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JB-4

s/defintion/definition/
s/sancions/sanctions/

and I agree, in fact there is no concept of precision in XSD decimals

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#decimal
There is a minimum number of 18 decimal digits.

	Andy
	
>
> Corresponding to ACTION-322, ACTION-340, and ACTION-401.
>
> - Steve
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 18:08:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT