W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Review test cases

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:19:08 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTikGwyHdZpn0PL=GGH-PHDHV5Wssng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: Olivier Corby <olivier.corby@inria.fr>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sorry, I fixed that now.
If I keep making so many mistakes, I won't be allowed to write any
more test cases (that's my hope at least ;-) )
Birte

On 7 April 2011 12:11, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
> I can't even parse the queries:
>
> ==rdf01.rq
> Line 4, column 11: Unresolved prefixed name: rdf:Property
> ==rdf02.rq
> Line 4, column 6: Unresolved prefixed name: rdf:type
>
>        Andy
>
> On 06/04/11 19:00, Birte Glimm wrote:
>>
>> On 6 April 2011 10:54, Olivier Corby<olivier.corby@inria.fr>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Birte,
>>>
>>> I pass all the entailment test cases with success now !
>>> There were just a "." missing in rdfs03.ttl and rdfs04.ttl and the @base
>>> were still present in manifest.ttl, I corrected these typos.
>>
>> That's great. Sorry for the stupid missing dots. I probably should run
>> ARQ on them since I have it insalled anyway to at least make sure they
>> parse properly. Not sure whether or how I can get ARQ to do
>> materialization/entailment. Since my implementation is only doing OWL
>> Direct Semantics, I don't even attempt to read the other tests
>> normaly.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Birte
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309
Computing Laboratory
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3QD
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 14:19:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT