W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Review test cases

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:11:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4D9D9BE7.3010102@epimorphics.com>
To: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
CC: Olivier Corby <olivier.corby@inria.fr>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I can't even parse the queries:

==rdf01.rq
Line 4, column 11: Unresolved prefixed name: rdf:Property
==rdf02.rq
Line 4, column 6: Unresolved prefixed name: rdf:type

	Andy

On 06/04/11 19:00, Birte Glimm wrote:
> On 6 April 2011 10:54, Olivier Corby<olivier.corby@inria.fr>  wrote:
>> Hi Birte,
>>
>> I pass all the entailment test cases with success now !
>> There were just a "." missing in rdfs03.ttl and rdfs04.ttl and the @base
>> were still present in manifest.ttl, I corrected these typos.
>
> That's great. Sorry for the stupid missing dots. I probably should run
> ARQ on them since I have it insalled anyway to at least make sure they
> parse properly. Not sure whether or how I can get ARQ to do
> materialization/entailment. Since my implementation is only doing OWL
> Direct Semantics, I don't even attempt to read the other tests
> normaly.
>
> Cheers,
> Birte
>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 11:12:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT