W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: last actions before F2F @all

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:48:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4BA8E2D9.8000601@talis.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> ACTION-197  - Paul (ta ask help from Andy?)
>   At least a rough roadmap on how we proceed for update test cases would be nice.

(3:13:59 PM) pgearon: AndyS: I've just been concerned about defining the 
data to be updated. Though it may be fine to use the current method of 
defining data, and make all modifications on the default graph. I 
believe that this involves an implicit LOAD

(3:14:31 PM) pgearon: is that what you were thinking of?

(3:16:04 PM) AndyS: pgearon - can define the initial graph store like 
did for query?

(3:17:21 PM) pgearon: I suppose that's how QUERY worked isn't it? I 
should have thought of it that way. Instead, I used default-graph-uri= 
in all my tests to point to the data for each specific test

(3:18:01 PM) pgearon: that was easier than doing a LOAD, then the query, 
then a DROP. But for Update tests that sequence will be required

(3:18:47 PM) pgearon: but since QUERY was defined that way, then I 
suppose it works for UPDATE too. OK, I'm good with that
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:49:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT