W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: DELETE and blank nodes

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:21:16 +0100
Message-ID: <4B8E705C.7080108@w3.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
CC: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 2010-3-3 14:32 , Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Meta-comment:
> 
> This style of analysis-proposals works very well for me and we also get
> the details more easily found in the archive.
> 
> Lee - Thank you

+1

Ivan

> 
>     Andy
> 
> On 03/03/2010 6:16 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> This email is in reference to
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/201 . It summarizes the
>> discussion of blank nodes in DELETE and concludes with what I see as two
>> reasonable proposals. Skip to the end if all you are interested in are
>> the proposals.
>>
>> == The Problem ==
> 
>> == Background ==
> 
>> == The Proposals ==
> 
>> == My Opinion ==
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF   : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
vCard  : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf



Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 14:21:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT