W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: DELETE and blank nodes

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:32:44 +0000
Message-ID: <4B8E64FC.1020003@talis.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Meta-comment:

This style of analysis-proposals works very well for me and we also get 
the details more easily found in the archive.

Lee - Thank you

	Andy

On 03/03/2010 6:16 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> This email is in reference to
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/201 . It summarizes the
> discussion of blank nodes in DELETE and concludes with what I see as two
> reasonable proposals. Skip to the end if all you are interested in are
> the proposals.
>
> == The Problem ==

> == Background ==

> == The Proposals ==

> == My Opinion ==
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 13:33:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT