- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:58:16 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 23/02/2010 1:33 PM, Steve Harris wrote: >> ** IN >> >> I suggest IN(arg,....) and NOT IN(arg,....) > > Full syntax would be "val [NOT] IN (arg,...)" - right? IN (...) on it's > own would not be legal. Yes. It's an infix operator. The LHS is an expression, the RHS a list of expressions. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 16:58:46 UTC