W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: [TF-LIB] Finalizing built-ins

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:58:16 +0000
Message-ID: <4B840928.1060801@talis.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 23/02/2010 1:33 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
>> ** IN
>>
>> I suggest IN(arg,....) and NOT IN(arg,....)
>
> Full syntax would be "val [NOT] IN (arg,...)" - right? IN (...) on it's
> own would not be legal.

Yes.

It's an infix operator.  The LHS is an expression, the RHS a list of 
expressions.

	Andy
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 16:58:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT