- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:52:35 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 23/02/2010 2:09 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> >> We could support dynamic function call. Possibilities include: >> >> ?function(?arg1, ?arg2, ....) >> CALL(?function, ?arg1, ?arg2, ....) > > I don't think dynamic function calls are a good idea at this point. > Mainly because I don't think we really have time to consider the issue > in any significant depth. Noted. If we can find good names, I'll be more sanguine about no proper dynamic calls. I will check the grammar can accommodate it regardless of the WG decision as future-proofing. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 16:53:00 UTC