W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

ISSUE-35: DISTINCT/aggregates

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:09:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4B6983A5.4050909@talis.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

On 03/02/2010 12:15 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2010, at 08:42, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> ...
>> ISSUE-35
>> Can aggregate functions take DISTINCT as an argument a la SELECT
>> DONE All built-in aggregates can take the word DISTINCT.
>> Custom ones do not; it's part of their definition,
>> i.e. different URIs for a DISTINCT and non DISTINCT form.
> I thought that the custom ones could also take DISTINCT? My recollection
> may well be wrong though. Do you have a link to the strawpoll?

By using a keyword argument, it undermines the idea that the URI 
identifies one thing - it's really now two, the DISTINCT and 
non-DISTINCT versions.

I'd expect COUNT(*) and COUNT(DISTINCT *) to have different URIs.

Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 14:09:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:59 UTC