W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Alexandre Bertails: Re: SPARQL WG publication of 1 FPWD and 6 new versions of WDs

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:34:46 -0500
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <12072.1264520086@waldron>

attached mail follows:


Hi Axel,

I still have some issues for some documents. Note that the pubrules 
checker is ok for all of them.

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/gen.html
>   
There are broken links and broken fragments.

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/gen.html
>   

There are broken fragments.

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/gen.html
>   

There are broken fragments.

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/gen.html
>   

This one is ok.

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/Overview.html
>   

This one is ok.

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/gen.html
>   

There are broken links and broken fragments. I would suggest you to not 
point to fragments while using a Latest Version URL that is not a 
Recommendation, as it can be broken at anytime. For example: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query//#rdfDataset . Use a dated URL instead./

> Moreover, we resolved [7] to publish one additional FPWD (the shortname approval is in the end of this mail), current location:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/property-paths/gen.html
>   

There are broken fragments.

Alexandre.
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 15:34:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT