W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Response to ST-1

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:23:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4C2AB8A6.70309@thefigtrees.net>
To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I think this response needs to be updated, but I haven't updated it yet. 

Sebastian's question about CONSTRUCT is something we've discussed -- 
allowing CONSTRUCT to use GRAPH to emit quads. (E.g. Anzo (Glitter) 
supports this.)

I believe there has been significant support in the WG for this, but the 
main stumbling block that has prevented us from moving on this is the 
lack of a standard serialization format for quads / named graphs.

I think the response to the 2nd half of Sebastian's message ought to 
reflect the above.


On 6/29/2010 4:58 PM, Paul Gearon wrote:
> Sorry, cut and paste error. The response draft is at:
>    http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:ST-1
> Paul
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Paul Gearon<gearon@ieee.org>  wrote:
>> I've left a response for Sebastian Trueg at:
>>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html
>> This is in response to his email asking for "named graph templates" to
>> be allowed in all SPARQL 1.1 Update commands. The original email is
>> at:
>>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html
>> Please leave comments on my response or update it.
>> Regards,
>> Paul Gearon
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 03:23:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:00 UTC