W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Closing comment RN-1

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:19:51 -0400
Message-ID: <4C2AB7D7.9030605@thefigtrees.net>
To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 6/29/2010 4:11 PM, Paul Gearon wrote:
> Hi,
> I went to check on RN-1, and Richard did indeed say that it was OK to
> close. However, he suggested that I may want to document a response on
> the mailing list.
> In drafting a response, I noticed that a few things have changed over
> time, and it is possible that Richard may want to readdress some of
> the issues. With this in mind, I've put the response on the wiki.
> Please let me know if this needs to be modified.
>    http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RN-1
> Once approved, or updated and approved, then I'll send it out.

I updated the response to reflect the group's resolution on blank nodes 
in the DELETE template (see other thread).

I made one other small (style) change.

As it now stands, I think it is good to be sent out.

Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 03:20:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:00 UTC