- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:56:16 +0100
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 2010-04-18, at 19:38, Gregory Williams wrote: > So you could indicate that your endpoint supports a custom aggregate with: > >> [] a sd:Service ; sd:extensionFunction ex:myAggregate . > > > Does anyone have thoughts on how that should be aligned with a renaming of sd:AggregateFunction to indicate that it's not really a function? Maybe we add a new property sd:extensionAggregate that is a subproperty of sd:feature? That makes sense to me - what's the range of sd:extensionFunction? - Steve -- Steve Harris, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2010 18:56:46 UTC