W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: ACTION summary

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:59:01 +0000
Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CB7647DB-A65D-4076-B962-F27F1E06D1C4@deri.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
> Has this ever been advocated or is it just speculation?

What we have in the notes to this action is the following:

"2009-11-02 23:14:05: [SteveH_]: this should probably do the same thing as CONSTRUCT, i.e. mint new bnodes for each solution"

I was thinking of converting it into an issue in the light of that we haven't got any other mechanism to mint 
bnodes in subselects so far.

Axel


On 22 Dec 2009, at 11:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> 
> 
> On 22/12/2009 11:25, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > CAN BE CLOSED?
> > ==============
> >
> > ACTION-134: Steve and Andy to figure out what happens with SELECT ( _:b1 AS ?blank)
> > I'd suggest to close ACTION-134 referring to
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0539.html
> > probably convert it into an issue?
> 
> Has this ever been advocated or is it just speculation?
> 
> I believe this is addressed because _:b1 is illegal as an expression in
> FILTERs in query 1.0 so this has never been possible and it was just a
> question raised.
> 
>         Andy
> 
Received on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 11:59:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT