W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Response

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:11:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4B26B7F9.6020200@talis.com>
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

> Leigh Dodds suggested a built-in mechanism for POSTing RDF graphs to a
> container resource which then responds with a 201 such that the server can
> determine the URI used to store the payload as a new, named RDF graph and
> indicate this to the client.  The changes were made to 4.3 HTTP POST

There now seem to be two concepts for "container" - graph store and 
graph. It would be worth pulling this out explicitly.

Where is the "insertion use case" that is mentioned?

	Andy
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 22:11:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT