W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

[TF-ENT] Requirements and Issues

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:19:36 +0000
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA3693EA8D6C7@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Is there going to be a requirements phase?
We seem to discussing requirements in the guise of implicit assumptions in the proposed text.

How are issues going to be handled?
The WG has an issue tracker - is that going to be used?  Who arises issues?

	Andy

Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:20:59 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Steve Harris: "Re: service description vocabulary"
Previous message: Seaborne, Andy: "RE: Updated on the Features and Rationale document"
In reply to: Birte Glimm: "Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal"
Next in thread: Bijan Parsia: "Re: [TF-ENT] Requirements and Issues"
Reply: Bijan Parsia: "Re: [TF-ENT] Requirements and Issues"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:15 GMT