W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues 2009-Aug-18

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:43:44 -0400
Message-ID: <4A895080.6010102@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Main agenda item is to attempt to reach consensus on a mechanism for 
service discovery. I note that we have a large number of regrets for 
this and next week's teleconference, so while I would like us to 
continue to make progress, I will be more inclined to make conditional 
decisions to move forward rather than assume we've reached full-group 


     *  Date of Call: Tuesday August 18, 2009
     * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: + (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql 
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 60 minutes
     * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
     * Scribe: SimonKJ (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-08-18

[edit] Regrets
[edit] Agenda

     * Admin
           o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at 
           o Next meeting: 2009-08-18 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT, pgearon 
to scribe (Scribe List)
           o Please comment on your availability for F2F2
     * Liaisons
           o Anything to report?
           o OWL WG (Bijan)
           o HCLS (Eric)
           o XQuery (Eric)
           o RIF WG (Axel)
           o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
     * Action/issue status - via tracker: 
     * Service Description
           o Last TC discussion was 
                 + See ISSUE-31
           o Review progress on service description vocabulary. See 
Greg's mail - 
           o Discovery mechanism - 7+ options discussed
                 + at first F2F 
                 + recently on mailing list 
                 + Also resulting mail thread on DESCRIBE_ENDPOINT - 
           o Specification organization (with SPARQL/Protocol, separate 
document, or something else?)

[edit] Regrets

     * BGlimm
     * Orri
     * SteveH
     * AndyS
     * kasei (at risk)
     * LukeWM
Received on Monday, 17 August 2009 12:44:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:57 UTC