W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Implementations of entailment in F&R

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:26:09 -0400
Message-ID: <1fc9c2ff0907080726v4ede8311y7415f597b73f5ef3@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

I think it would be useful information, particularly since time
permitting is the limit, to include in F&R information about existing
implementations of OWL entailment in SPARQL.

Pellet is one such (with the SPARQL-DL that's been mentioned here) and
there may be others; but this seems relevant information and I can't
think of any good reasons why it shouldn't be included; if for no
other reason, it makes the "time permitting" and the "we must do
these" features more parallel and consistent.

Kendall Clark
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 14:27:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:57 UTC