W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

SPARQL WG agenda for Tuesday July 7, 2009

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:47:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4A520E70.8030500@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-07-07

We'll discuss negation & update - with the goals being to adopt base 
designs for each, if possible.

     *  Date of Call: Tuesday July 07, 2009
     * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql 
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 60 minutes
     * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
     * Scribe: Kjetil (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-07-07

[edit] Regrets
[edit] Agenda

     * Admin
           o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-06-30
           o Next meeting: 2009-07-14 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT, SteveH to 
scribe (Scribe List)
     * Liaisons
           o Anything to report?
           o OWL WG (Bijan)
           o HCLS (Eric)
           o XQuery (Eric)
           o RIF WG (Axel)
           o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
     * Action/issue status - via tracker: 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/
     * Negation:
           o mails on set based semantics of MINUS
           o 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0394.html 
UNSAID/NOT EXISTS implemented in ARQ]
           o See this mail with proposal from AndyS 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0433.html
     * Update:
           o AndyS: discuss whether to start with the submission as the 
strawman for the update language. Are there alternatives to consider? 
(After strawman -- start throwing rocks at it to test it out)
           o If so, I'd like to get one or more reviewers (unconnected 
to the submission, preferably) to do an initial review

[edit] Regrets

     * Axel P
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 14:48:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT