FEATURE: SPARQLX

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/SPARQLX

There are two flavor of proposal on the table:

	The old SPARQLX proposal:
		http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/ 
0414.html
	An RDF based proposal:
		http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ 
2009Mar/0010.html

I personally do not find an RDF/XML syntax to meet my requirements  
(since RDF/XML doesn't play that well with the XML toolchain), though  
an RDF based syntax may be desirable for other reasons.

Cheers,
Bijan.