W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2009

FEATURE: SPARQLX

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:49 +0100
Message-Id: <7ED2E56C-8FE4-4029-B9E6-93A0973CEFC9@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/SPARQLX

There are two flavor of proposal on the table:

	The old SPARQLX proposal:
		http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/ 
0414.html
	An RDF based proposal:
		http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ 
2009Mar/0010.html

I personally do not find an RDF/XML syntax to meet my requirements  
(since RDF/XML doesn't play that well with the XML toolchain), though  
an RDF based syntax may be desirable for other reasons.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 11:15:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT