W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2009

RE: volunteers for 31-March teleconference

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:23:27 +0000
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA3628DBCB98C@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
> * Assignment (Andy ?)

Yes - I'll do that one.

	Andy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
> Sent: 26 March 2009 15:17
> To: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: volunteers for 31-March teleconference
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Here's what's on my list to go after on Tuesday. We might not get to all
> of it, of course. I've put suggested volunteers in parentheses -- please
> let me know if your name is here and you can't/choose not to present a
> feature or if your name is NOT here and you wish to present a feature :-
> )
> 
> We'll start with finishing the topics from last week, and then move back
> to an emphasis on query language proposed features.
> 
> 
> * ExecCommentsAndWarnings (Ivan M. / Orri?)
> * Query response linking (Lee, presenting on behalf of Leigh Dodds from
> -comments)
> * Assignment (Andy ?)
> * Accessing lists (Ivan H. ?)
> * FunctionLibrary[1] (Lee)
> * SurfaceSyntax[1] (Lee)
> * FullText (Kjetil? Else Ivan M. or Orri? Else I'm happy to do it)
> 
> [1] Note, for these two, I intend to discuss whether or not we should
> include these as work items in general - if we do decide to, I think
> it's reasonable to move discussion of the specific functions and/or
> surface syntax to be pushed to the mailing list and even pushed to when
> we begin our actual specification work.
> 
> As always, please remember that we will not end up discussing all
> proposed features on the teleconferences, but all WG members will have
> the opportunity to express their opinion on all features via a survey in
> 2-3 weeks from now. This means:
> 
> 1) please follow & join in the mailing list discussion for any features
> you are concerned about
> 
> 2) please start mailing list discussions of any features that you want -
> I'm trying my best to do this with features that I don't expect to be
> able to cover in teleconferences, but I can't guarantee completeness :-)
> 
> Lee
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 15:24:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT