Axel wrote: > but where there is no prior document, I guess we wouldn't need that. Right, there is no previous version, but there may well be a successor, and I'd like to prepare for that. It feels awkward that we need to talk about the previous SPARQL by a new name, i.e. SPARQL/Query 1.0, and so I'd like to define a version so that the next WG doesn't need to. KjetilReceived on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 09:22:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:12 GMT