Axel wrote: > Proposed strawman: > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql-features/ That's OK, but I've felt that we need to version our combined efforts, and this is an example of why; there can sure be a WG after us that will produce a similar document, so perhaps sparql-11-features? KjetilReceived on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 08:16:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:12 GMT