Re: Some comments on F&R (2)

On 11 Jun 2009, at 09:52, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>
> If it's because you want SPARQL/Update as the name for the language  
> (not a bad idea) how about:

Mostly, yes.

> 4 Update
>
>    * 4.1 SPARQL/Update Language
>        ...
>    * 4.2 Protocol Enhancements for Update
>        ...

Works for me.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10  
9AD

Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 09:57:04 UTC