W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Some comments on F&R (2)

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:07:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4A30C96D.2020909@deri.org>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Axel wrote before:
 > I agree that Protocol enhancements could have more things, which
 > aren't related to update alone.

Hmmm, thinking about it again, and seeing Adny's answer, I think I 
better retract that. Since we didn't agree on any *other* Protocol 
enhancements, especially as we keep "Service Descriptions" as a separate 
point, Andy's argument makes sense also to make the scope clear.

 > "HTTP based graph update via the protocol is orthogonal to the
 > SPARQL/Update language mentioned above. Whether or not there will be a
 > concrete mapping between SPARQL/Update and HTTP based graph update is
 > currently under discussion in the working group."

Independently of the structure, that is still a valid issue to be 
noted... kind of the evolution of ISSUE-17


Axel



Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steve Harris [mailto:steve.harris@garlik.com]
>> Sent: 11 June 2009 09:14
>> To: Seaborne, Andy
>> Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Some comments on F&R (2)
>>
>> On 10 Jun 2009, at 10:46, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>
>> I broadly agree with Andy, but for
>>
>>> Structure:
>>> Currently it is:
>>> ----
>>> #  4 SPARQL/Update 1.0
>>>
>>>    * 4.1 Update
>>>
>>> # 5 Protocol Enhancements
>>>
>>>    * 5.1 HTTP graph update
>> I think it's correct as it is. SPARQL/Update is part of a language,
>> and the protocol is something else.
> 
> If it's because you want SPARQL/Update as the name for the language (not a bad idea) how about:
> 
> 4 Update
> 
>     * 4.1 SPARQL/Update Language
>         ...
>     * 4.2 Protocol Enhancements for Update
>         ...       
> 
> To reflect the resolutions:
> 
> "SPARQL WG will pursue a full-featured, multi-graph update language" [R2]
> "SPARQL WG will pursue RESTful operations for updating RDF stores" [R3]
> 
> 
> [R2] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-06-02#resolution_2
> [R3] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-06-02#resolution_3
> Good bot.
> 
> 
>> - Steve
>>
>> --
>> Steve Harris
>> Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
>> +44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/
>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10
>> 9AD
> 


-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 09:08:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT