W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [ISSUE-30] Suggestions for HTTP protocol updates

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:50:55 +0200
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200906041350.55375.Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
On Thursday 04 June 2009 12:57:20 Steve Harris wrote:
> Nothing in http://triplr.org/turtle/www.kanzaki.com/works/ expects the  
> *client* to break apart the URI or try to determine meaning from  
> fragments it didn't assemble itself, so it has no more impact on  
> opacity than ?graph=.

Ah, you're right. I can accept that.

But still, it is easier to use it if you get a parameter in most frameworks, 
which takes care of the parsing.

Kind regards 

Kjetil Kjernsmo
-- 
Senior Knowledge Engineer / SPARQL F&R Editor
Mobile: +47 986 48 234
Email: kjetil.kjernsmo@computas.com   
Web: http://www.computas.com/

|  SHARE YOUR KNOWLEDGE  |

Computas AS  PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax:+47 6783 
1001
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2009 11:51:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT