W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: More fulltext advocacy (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:49:18 +0200
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200905051149.18902.Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 11:17:30 Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> A special case is use in a filter (that does just test for a pattern being
> higher than some threshold so it is a constraint and is more like a regex).
> The filter form is unnecessary unless non-conjunctive combinations of text
> checking and other filter expressions are really imporant.

Could you please explain this a little further? I have thought of the freetext 
matching I've done as a filter, and that it would have been syntactically 
more elegant to write it as such, so I do not quite understand the context 
they are unnecessary.

Someone has to be asking the stupid questions here, sorry. :-)

Kind regards 

Kjetil Kjernsmo
Senior Knowledge Engineer
Mobile: +47 986 48 234
Email: kjetil.kjernsmo@computas.com   
Web: http://www.computas.com/


Computas AS  PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax:+47 6783 
Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2009 09:49:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:56 UTC