RE: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bijan Parsia [mailto:bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk]
> Sent: 15 April 2009 11:59
> To: Seaborne, Andy
> Cc: Axel Polleres; 'RDF Data Access Working Group'
> Subject: Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion
> 
> On 14 Apr 2009, at 14:34, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> > -1 : Too early. Do the important, well understood, well explored
> > features first.  SPARQL already has an extension point on BGP
> > matching. Use this and other extension mechanisms to explore this
> > area.  Much already possible, maybe inconveniently and not ideally,
> > with named graphs and different endpoint setups over the same base
> > data.
> [snip]
> 
> Thinking about this, wouldn't pragmas do the job admirably? I.e., for
> suggesting/requiring a particular entailment regime?
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.

Yes.  That was included under "other extension mechanisms" - I just avoiding getting into the "how".  My understanding and mental model for the query-part labelling pragmas would be able to do this via qualifiers to patterns or the whole query.  Opps - getting into "how" :-)

 Andy

Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 14:23:15 UTC