W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Parameterized Inference - starting mail discussion

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:59:15 +0100
Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2CAB9713-C184-445C-9A11-F95CF5C1CD2A@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
On 14 Apr 2009, at 14:34, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

> -1 : Too early. Do the important, well understood, well explored  
> features first.  SPARQL already has an extension point on BGP  
> matching. Use this and other extension mechanisms to explore this  
> area.  Much already possible, maybe inconveniently and not ideally,  
> with named graphs and different endpoint setups over the same base  
> data.

Thinking about this, wouldn't pragmas do the job admirably? I.e., for  
suggesting/requiring a particular entailment regime?

Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 10:59:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:56 UTC