W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: Agenda - 21 Aug 2007 @ 14:30 UTC

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:37:39 +0100
Message-ID: <46C9D163.80703@hp.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>



> 2. Test suite
> 
> We're ready to approve the remaining tests and publish and advertise the 
> test
> suite. Please see this email for details on the remaining tests and 
> contribute
> implementation results when you can:
> 
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0089.html

ARQ passes all the tests under manifest-evaluation.ttl, both normal and 
reference query engine (so includes runing with no optimizer "helping" for the 
new combo and complex tests :-))

The i18n/ and dataset/ directories, which are marked approved, weren't in 
manifest-evaluation so I added them and committed  manifest-evaluation.ttl. 
They are already using the URIs.

I make it 237 tests in 23 sets.

EARL results:

http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/DAWG/

> 5. Test license
> 
> See 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2007Aug/0016.html
> 
> . I'm guessing our tests are licensed under the W3C License:
>    http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231

I'm happy with this license.

We need to ensure point 1 (display of the notice) is handled.

W3C would be the copyright holder as the tests were developed by the working 
group?

	Andy

> 
> ...but we should clarify this.
-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 17:37:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:37 GMT