W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2007

all facets covered, list of tests to approve:

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:31:59 -0400
Message-ID: <46C64C0F.3040900@thefigtrees.net>
To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/facets-coverage#coverage

...shows that the tests under data-r2/* now cover all of the facets 
identified by Eric. We've also taken extensive tests from ARQ, a couple 
of tests from SteveH, and some tests from Chimezie to cover more 
complicated algebraic constructs.

Repeating the steps from 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0076.html

The updated query for unapproved tests is at

http://pastebin.org/738

sparql.org tells me that the tests left to approve are:

<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/algebra/manifest#join-combo-1>
         "Join operator with OPTs, BGPs, and UNIONs"

<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/algebra/manifest#join-combo-2>
         "Join operator with Graph and Union"
 
<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/optional/manifest#dawg-optional-complex-1>
         "Complex optional semantics: 1"

<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/optional/manifest#dawg-optional-complex-2>
         "Complex optional semantics: 2"

<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/optional/manifest#dawg-optional-complex-3>
         "Complex optional semantics: 3"

<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/optional/manifest#dawg-optional-complex-4>
         "Complex optional semantics: 4"

<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/sort/manifest#dawg-sort-builtin>
         "Builtin sort"

<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/sort/manifest#dawg-sort-function>
         "Function sort"

<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/sort/manifest#dawg-sort-numbers>
         "Expression sort"

Of these, the first 6 are Chimezie's tests, which I think have now all 
been examined and should be correct. The last 3 are sorting tests I 
added to cover sort methods other than simple variables.

Please submit implementation results for these tests when you can, as 
we'll approve them first thing on Tuesday.

Lee
Received on Saturday, 18 August 2007 01:32:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:37 GMT