- From: Jeen Broekstra <j.broekstra@tue.nl>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:36:51 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>> For example, the query
>>>
>>> PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>
>>> SELECT INDISTINCT ?name WHERE { ?x foaf:name ?name }
>>>
>>> may have one, two (shown here) or three solutions:
>>> name
>>> "Alice"
>>> "Alice"
>> Of course, this only holds for a dataset which holds at least three
>> solutions for Alice, you might want to make that more explicit in this
>> paragraph (referring back to the example dataset explicitly?).
>
> I think that in context with the DISTINCT proposal, it's clear. See
> the attached HTML and tell me if you agree.
Well... Not to be a pain about this, but I still think making a clearer
reference is better. If I start reading the document at section 9.4 (by
clicking the link to "9.4 LOOSE" in the ToC) I will not have seen the
previous section and the example dataset.
Andy's suggestion to do some (sub)section rearrangement might also help
here.
Cheers,
Jeen
--
Dr. Jeen Broekstra Den Dolech 2
Information Systems Group HG 7.76
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science P.O. Box 513
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 5600 MB Eindhoven
tel. +31 (0)40 247 36 86 The Netherlands
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 09:39:54 UTC