Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com> wrote on 02/26/2007 10:05:42 PM: > On Feb 26, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > > > > > 1/ Eliminate application/xml from our list of accepted input > > serializations. To some extent, this addresses the confusion Bjoern > > had > > initially (why application/xml and not application/sparql-query). Does > > anyone know of any servers or clients that use application/xml > > serialization? > > We will be building one in the next few months that does, largely so > we can support SparqlX. Thanks, Kendall. So that I'm clear, SparqlX is this, right? -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0414.html But you will also be supporting the WSDL-mandated application/xml serialization? (<st:query-request>...</st:query-request>) LeeReceived on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 03:18:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:08 GMT