W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: AndyS's syntax tests now in CVS

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:50:20 +0100
To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070215095020.GB8145@w3.org>
* Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com> [2007-02-08 16:40-0500]
> 
> Re: ACTION: LeeF to add Andy's bnode label scope tests to CVS as 
> unapproved syntax tests
> 
> I've committed Andy's tests to CVS in the tests/data-r2/syntax-sparql4 
> directory. I added a manifest.ttl, and added this manifest to the 
> manifest-syntax.ttl super-manifest. 
> I haven't run the tests yet, though I imagine I need to update my engine 
> to pass them all. 
> 
> I'd like to set about approving these tests at next Tuesday's meeting, so 
> if you have an engine, give them a shot and let us know the results.

Passed them all, but after the deadline. Oh well.

> thanks,
> Lee

Per http://www.w3.org/2007/01/30-dawg-minutes , FILTERs do not break
up a BGP, but everything else does. I have
[[
PREFIX : <http://example.org/>
SELECT *
WHERE
{
  _:a ?p ?v . OPTIONAL { ?s ?p ?v } _:a ?q 1
}
]]
ready to commit if noone argues.

Algae currently passes this test as well, though wouldn't for BGPs
broken up by GRAPH. Are BGPs broken up by GRAPH?
-- 
-eric

office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +1.857.222.5741

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 09:50:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:35 GMT