W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: perhaps now is the time to address issues#accessingCollections? [Fwd: Re: an extension to SPARQL]

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:49:52 -0500
Message-Id: <15ECAC1C-CDC8-41A5-BD07-72C0F76110D8@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>

On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> Dan Connolly wrote on 01/08/2007 02:10:40 PM:
>> The attached comment is new information on  
>> issues#accessingCollections .
>> It seems to me that the algebraic approach to specifying SPARQL
>> might making this sort of thing fairly straightforward; i.e.
>> the situation looks different to me than it did in Feb 2005
>> when we resolved to postpone.
>> Does anybody else think it's worth taking another look at this now?
> It's on this week's agenda, so we'll at least get a feel for how  
> people
> feel about the costs and benefits of taking up accessingCollections  
> as a
> new feature at this point.

Lee, I have to send regrets for tomorrow's meeting; I trust you will  
consider my strong "no" vote to reopening accessingCollections?


Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 19:50:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:53 UTC