On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > > Dan Connolly wrote on 01/08/2007 02:10:40 PM: > >> The attached comment is new information on >> issues#accessingCollections . >> >> It seems to me that the algebraic approach to specifying SPARQL >> might making this sort of thing fairly straightforward; i.e. >> the situation looks different to me than it did in Feb 2005 >> when we resolved to postpone. >> >> Does anybody else think it's worth taking another look at this now? > > It's on this week's agenda, so we'll at least get a feel for how > people > feel about the costs and benefits of taking up accessingCollections > as a > new feature at this point. Lee, I have to send regrets for tomorrow's meeting; I trust you will consider my strong "no" vote to reopening accessingCollections? Thanks. Cheers, KendallReceived on Monday, 8 January 2007 19:50:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:08 GMT