On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > The attached comment is new information on > issues#accessingCollections . > > It seems to me that the algebraic approach to specifying SPARQL > might making this sort of thing fairly straightforward; i.e. > the situation looks different to me than it did in Feb 2005 > when we resolved to postpone. > > Does anybody else think it's worth taking another look at this now? UMD would oppose any move to reopen this (or, likely, any other) issue at this time. Cheers, KendallReceived on Monday, 8 January 2007 19:24:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:08 GMT