W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2007

Agenda - 3 Apr @ 14:30 UTC

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:45:04 -0400
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF6F2E7F22.06A4D10D-ON852572B0.0066F3FF-852572B0.00670078@us.ibm.com>

Note: The meeting is still at 14:30 UTC. Please make sure to check that 
you're attending at the right time: 

0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 3 April 2007
at 14:30:00 UTC
         + LeeF chairing
         + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 
tel:+ tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333
           ** Note that Zakim is back up and running, so we'll be using it 
for our telecon.
         + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
         + Scribe: ericP
         + Regrets: 
         + roll call
         + approve 20 Mar minutes [2]
         + next meeting 10 Apr. @@ recruit scribe
         + agenda comments?

1. Review ACTION Items

These actions appear DONE:

ACTION: AndyS to incorporate and explain the notion of active graph in 
section 8 and/or wherever else appropriate
ACTION: Eric to incorporate text for REDUCED into rq25, including text 
noting that REDUCED does not play nicely with counting
ACTION: ericP schedule teleconf for Friday

Let's check on the status of the following actions:

ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests 
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/06-dawg-minutes.html#action03]
ACTION: LeeF or EliasT to reply to Bjoern regarding (not) POSTing 
application/sparql-query documents [recorded in 
ACTION: LeeF to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put 
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/06-dawg-minutes.html#action05]

2. Last Call comment handling


3. Test suite

Our attention now needs to turn to the test suite (and to responding to 
the community's comments on the draft, of course). Let's return to the 
latest set of tests that appear ready to be approved into the new test 

Jeen moved some query evaluation tests to the new testing environment...

...and Andy corrected a typo and reports that ARQ passes the tests.

I also passed the tests (and eyeballed the tests that I wasn't able to 

Please try to take a look at these tests in advance so that we can approve 

Eric proposed a syntax test similar to what we approved a few weeks ago to 
note that OPTIONAL clauses break up BGPs. He also suggested similar tests 
for the GRAPH keyword.

Let's discuss and approve these tests.

4. What needs to be done on the test suite?




+ more tests moved to data-r2
+ updated README
+ updated overview page
+ @@

5. Towards CR


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  [Eric, upon approval, can you please move these to the normal location 
so that the LC request accurately points to the decision in the approved 
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2007 18:45:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:53 UTC