Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: >> mfx:xsd-date-eq-xsd-dateTime — allow dates to be compared with >> dateTimes (not in XPath http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#mapping). > > After yesterday's meeting, AndyS indicated that xsd:date and > xsd:dateTime are comparable in F&O, in which case, my operator > mapping for this is wrong. Andy, could you help me find this? I don't think you can compare xsd:date and xsd:dateTime. Andy > >> The attached algae-results.txt show what I got when I disabled all the >> extensions. The '+'s in the error results of open-eq-12 concearn me as >> that means that my implementation running in unextended mode got >> answered that did not show up in the extended version. Someone needs >> to look closely at this; me if noone else gets to it sooner. I won't >> be back until just before the meeting on Tuesday. > > After I sent this, I thought about this and reallized it was because > open-eq-12 uses NAF. That it, it uses !bound to test for the lack of > triples. > > Hmm, worth writing down in a result set that NAF was detected?Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 13:38:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:27 GMT