W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Open world value tests

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:37:51 +0000
Message-ID: <4548A32F.1000904@hp.com>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>   mfx:xsd-date-eq-xsd-dateTime — allow dates to be compared with
>>   dateTimes (not in XPath http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#mapping).
> After yesterday's meeting, AndyS indicated that xsd:date and
> xsd:dateTime are comparable in F&O, in which case, my operator
> mapping for this is wrong. Andy, could you help me find this?

I don't think you can compare xsd:date and xsd:dateTime.


>> The attached algae-results.txt show what I got when I disabled all the
>> extensions. The '+'s in the error results of open-eq-12 concearn me as
>> that means that my implementation running in unextended mode got
>> answered that did not show up in the extended version. Someone needs
>> to look closely at this; me if noone else gets to it sooner. I won't
>> be back until just before the meeting on Tuesday.
> After I sent this, I thought about this and reallized it was because
> open-eq-12 uses NAF. That it, it uses !bound to test for the lack of
> triples.
> Hmm, worth writing down in a result set that NAF was detected?
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 13:38:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:52 UTC