- From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@aduna-software.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:08:08 +0100
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:57 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > Jeen Broekstra wrote: > > > > We're currently testing our new SPARQL parser/engine and ran into an > > issue with the DAWG syntax test cases. > > > > According to > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/manifest.ttl , specifically DAWG-approved tests syntax-bnodes-03.rq and syntax-bnodes-04.rq, it is legal syntax to have blank node labels in the predicate position. (either [] or _:a). > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxDev/ > > is the working copy based on the current grammar. (Dev, not Full) > > Full is (or rather "was") the version of the first full version of the syntax > that the WG approved. Ah ok. I've switched to using SyntaxDev. I see you are using an idea we had earlier of creating a 'super manifest' that can include multiple other manifests. Currently the super manifest uses a jena-specific namespace, however. To make it more generic (and also a bit easier to use for us) I would like to make the following changes: - the 'include' property and the 'TestSyntax' class are added to the DAWG test case vocabulary; the jena-specific namespace can then be removed. - the range of the 'include' property is redefined as a single Manifest URL (in your current version it's a collection which is harder to process, for me at least), so the super-manifest will contain a 'include' property for each manifest. If nobody objects I will implement and check in these changes. Jeen -- Aduna - Guided Exploration www.aduna-software.com Prinses Julianaplein 14-b 3817 CS Amersfoort The Netherlands +31-33-4659987 (office)
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 12:11:00 UTC