Re: agenda, 24 Oct 2006, 14:30 UTC

On Oct 23, 2006, at 12:09 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

>
> Kendall Clark wrote on 10/23/2006 10:42:05 AM:
>
>
> > 3. Scope of FILTER
> >
> > This has been hanging around for several weeks now; we had a  
> proposal
> > last week: where are we now? Last week's discussion quickly moved to
> > how we spell OPTIONAL; does this issue depend on that one?
>
> I created some test cases that I think illustrate the effects of  
> FILTERs being scoped to the smallest enclosing group. Perhaps we  
> can make progress by asking if people agree/disagree with these  
> test cases?

Yes.

Cheers,
Kendall