W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: agenda, 24 Oct 2006, 14:30 UTC

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:09:21 -0400
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFCE7DAB88.C7A67991-ON85257210.0057295A-85257210.0058BF6E@us.ibm.com>
Kendall Clark wrote on 10/23/2006 10:42:05 AM:

> 3. Scope of FILTER
> This has been hanging around for several weeks now; we had a proposal 
> last week: where are we now? Last week's discussion quickly moved to 
> how we spell OPTIONAL; does this issue depend on that one?

I created some test cases that I think illustrate the effects of FILTERs 
being scoped to the smallest enclosing group. Perhaps we can make progress 
by asking if people agree/disagree with these test cases?

This message contains the test cases and explanations:


Received on Monday, 23 October 2006 16:30:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:52 UTC