W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: rq24 ready for publication

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:14:36 +0100
Message-ID: <4512822C.9040609@hp.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>



Bijan Parsia wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:39:02AM +0100, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>>> On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>>
>>>> In the editor's eyes, rq24 is ready to go out the door.
>>> Is this that draft:
>>> 	http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq24.html
>>>
>>> And thus the one I should skim-review?
>> Indeed. The issues have been whittled down to 2, summary statement
>> removed. Keep in mind that this is for a heartbeat publication
> 
> Actually, it's not just that, or even primarily that, at this point.  
> It's the publication of a working draft which, thus, changes where we  
> are in the process. I.e., we are no longer in CR, and will have  
> another last call.
> 
> Furthermore, I do believe I understood quite well my action from the  
> working group. Indeed, "skim-review" suggests that most strongly.
> 
>> and not
>> something we're hoping to carry down from the mountain.
> 
> That is, of course, true of just about any WD except perhaps LC WD.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
> 

The minutes of 5th Septmember [*] record the decision of the WG:

"""
<kendallclark> PROPOSAL: To publish rq24 on or shortly after 19 September,
after a sanity-check review by BijanP, and after SOTD updates by EricP.
"""

	Andy

[*]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/att-0204/05-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 12:14:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:27 GMT