- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:25:29 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:39:02AM +0100, Bijan Parsia wrote: >> >> On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: >> >>> In the editor's eyes, rq24 is ready to go out the door. >> >> Is this that draft: >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq24.html >> >> And thus the one I should skim-review? > > Indeed. The issues have been whittled down to 2, summary statement > removed. Keep in mind that this is for a heartbeat publication Actually, it's not just that, or even primarily that, at this point. It's the publication of a working draft which, thus, changes where we are in the process. I.e., we are no longer in CR, and will have another last call. Furthermore, I do believe I understood quite well my action from the working group. Indeed, "skim-review" suggests that most strongly. > and not > something we're hoping to carry down from the mountain. That is, of course, true of just about any WD except perhaps LC WD. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 11:26:15 UTC