W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2006

Fwd: SPARQL syntax

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:37:36 +0100
To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20060406083736.GB4085@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

Hi All,

I got this query, I remember discussing it, but I dont remember what the
WGs decision was, but the validator at
http://www.sparql.org/validator.html does certainly reject the two
approved tests.

- Steve

----- Forwarded message from Virginie Bottollier <Virginie.Bottollier@sophia.inria.fr> -----

> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:07:27 +0200
> From: Virginie Bottollier <Virginie.Bottollier@sophia.inria.fr>
> Subject: SPARQL syntax
> To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> 
> Dear Mr Harris
> 
> I looked at the tests for SPARQL in the tests page 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ and tried to run the tests 
> on Corese (The "Conceptual Resource Search Engine" we are working on; 
> see http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/corese/ if you want to know more).
> I have noticed 2 tests, marked as approved, but I think not correct with 
> the syntax:
> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/syntax-bnodes-03.rq> 
> 
> and
> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/SyntaxFull/syntax-bnodes-04.rq> 
> 
> Can we have a blank node at the property place? Perhaps I just 
> misunderstood the grammar, if this is the case please tell me.
> Thanks for your answer.
> 
>                           Virginie BOTTOLLIER
> 

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Stephen Harris                    07970 557047
AKT, IAM Research Group          023 8059 8347
University of Southampton, UK
swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk     http://www.aktors.org/           
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 08:38:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:26 GMT