- Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
- RDF Data Access
WG teleconference 2005-10-04T14:30Z (local
times)
- supplementary IRC chat: #dawg
- scribe: EricP
- roll call (wg
membership) Welcome Jeen, representing Vrije Universiteit
- PROPOSED: to accept RDF
Data Access Weekly -- 11 Oct 2005 plus ammendment
from DanC as a true record
- PROPOSED: to meet again 25 Oct per regular schedule
- scribe volunteer, please?
- Let's note these done without discussion (except perhaps an
attaboy):
- Let's continue these without discussion:
- ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
- ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match
manifest with negative tests [recorded in 09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
- ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
op:dateTime triple
- ACTION: DanC to notify www-rdf-comments about
difference between RDF URI refs and IRIs, e.g. spaces
- ACTION: EricP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern
(re BASE
IRI resolution)
- ACTION: EricP to respond to "ORDER with IRIs"
comment (11Oct)
- Comments on the agenda?
- toward Note on using SPARQL with WSDL 1.1
- ACTION: Lee to elaborate on how to use this WSDL
1.1 stuff with tools. progress
report 8 Oct (done. proto-wsdl11
1.7)
- ACTION: KC, EricP to review WSDL 1.1 sparql
protocol publication candidate, once a candidate pointer is mailed to
the WG (done)
- ACTION DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol
note, contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias
- protocol testing update
- SPARQL Protocol and WSDL
- ACTION KC: review sparql-types for xs:any
weirdness, w.r.t. WSDL 2.0 constraints
- ACTION: DanC to notifty DAWG of WSDL response to
our WSDL comments
- note: WSDL
happiness Kendall Clark (Wednesday, 28 September) and
thread
- ACTION: DanC to ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 and
WSDL 2 SPARQL protocol stuff, once both are available
- issues#rdfSemantics
- ACTION: Bijan to take a pass through the editor's
draft, listing what will change with the new semantics understanding,
and what will not
- ACTION: Enrico to take a pass through the editor's
draft, listing what will change with the new semantics understanding
...
- ACTION Bijan: estimate impact of "abstract syntax
entailment" etc. on WG test harness
- issues#valueTesting: handling type "error"s