RE: decimal/double test review? [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec]

These changes were a follow up to the decimal/double decision and the
action was to correct the test suite where the change had had an impact.
the test had been approved as part of an ealier #valueTesting vote:
hence the need to get the WG to verify the changes.

I don't have the facility to update the HTML page.  The tests changed in
CVS are:

Directory: tests/data/ExprEquals/
File: data-eq.ttl
   Commented out decimals

Query: query-eq-2.rq
   "Equality 1-2" ==> #equality-1-2


Query: query-eq-graph-2.rq
   "Equality 1-2 -- graph"  ==> #equality-1-2-graph

> Ah... sorry, you said that before, didn't you?

Doesn't really count - it was 4 minutes before the last telecon :-)

	Andy

-------- Original Message --------
> From: Dan Connolly <mailto:connolly@w3.org>
> Date: 19 December 2005 20:53
> 
> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 20:44 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > > hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
> > >               * ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test
> > >                 changes for later WG approval
> > 
> > Done.
> > 
> >
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.ht
> > ml
> 
> Ah... sorry, you said that before, didn't you?
> 
> Let's see now... exactly what tests are you proposing for approval?
> 
> Based on CVS logs, it looks lik just one:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#equality-1-1
> 
> The change is:
> 
> -:xd1 :p  1.0 .
> +:xd1 :p  "1.0e0"^^xsd:double .
> 
> That seems to isolate this test from the question of what 1.0 is.
> Has anybody else reviewed that test? It looks OK to me at a glance.
> 
> Do we have any tests for the decimal 1.3 syntax itself?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E