W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

decimal/double test review? [was: agenda: RDF Data Access 19 Dec]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:53:06 -0600
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1135025586.1358.174.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 20:44 +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
> >               * ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes
> >                 for later WG approval
> 
> Done.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.html

Ah... sorry, you said that before, didn't you?

Let's see now... exactly what tests are you proposing for approval?

Based on CVS logs, it looks lik just one:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#equality-1-1

The change is:

-:xd1 :p  1.0 .
+:xd1 :p  "1.0e0"^^xsd:double .

That seems to isolate this test from the question of what 1.0 is.
Has anybody else reviewed that test? It looks OK to me at
a glance.

Do we have any tests for the decimal 1.3 syntax itself?




-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 19 December 2005 20:53:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT