W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: review of WSDL 1.1 (thumbs up pending two minor points)

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:34:56 -0400
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20051017163452.GY17622@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:41:53AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 09:51 -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > I went through http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wsdl11/ . I
> > bring up a couple issues here, but I think they can be resolved
> > quickly. Once answered, I'm quite happy publishing. I'd like the chair
> > to note that, if there's a vote to publish, the WG is agreeing that
> > they've decided to use the Wiki "to share and develop code
> > examples". (Perhaps I simply didn't notice that the WG already agreed
> > to this.)
> 
> I think we did. The connection to the wiki wasn't recorded
> explicitly, but I'm pretty sure we talked about it when
> assigning this action:
> 
> "ACTION: EliasT to elaborate on how to use this WSDL 1.1 stuff with
> tools"
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action11
> 
> 
> > 
> > [[
> > The Working Group has chosen to use a Wiki page to share and develop
> > code examples [WSDL11-WIKI] of using the WSDL 1.1 to implement the
> > SPARQL Protocol for RDF, either as a service endpoint or as a client.
> > ]]
> > 
> > I've pestered some WSDL spec gurus to see if "equivilent" is the right
> > word in
> > [[
> > It is the intention of the Working Group that the interfaces, types,
> > faults, and operations defined non-normatively in this WSDL 1.1
> > document are equivalent to those normatively defined in WSDL 2.0 by
> > the SPARQL Protocol.
> > ]]

Hugo says this is fine, that there is no defined terminology for
equivilence, though other specs do address both 1.1 and 2.0.

> > next up is DanC:
> >           * ACTION DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note,
> > 	    contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias
> 
> OK, I'll see if I can get this done in the next day or so.
> 

-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 16:35:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT