W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: review of WSDL 1.1 (thumbs up pending two minor points)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:41:53 -0500
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1129560113.19638.106.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 09:51 -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> I went through http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wsdl11/ . I
> bring up a couple issues here, but I think they can be resolved
> quickly. Once answered, I'm quite happy publishing. I'd like the chair
> to note that, if there's a vote to publish, the WG is agreeing that
> they've decided to use the Wiki "to share and develop code
> examples". (Perhaps I simply didn't notice that the WG already agreed
> to this.)

I think we did. The connection to the wiki wasn't recorded
explicitly, but I'm pretty sure we talked about it when
assigning this action:

"ACTION: EliasT to elaborate on how to use this WSDL 1.1 stuff with


> [[
> The Working Group has chosen to use a Wiki page to share and develop
> code examples [WSDL11-WIKI] of using the WSDL 1.1 to implement the
> SPARQL Protocol for RDF, either as a service endpoint or as a client.
> ]]
> I've pestered some WSDL spec gurus to see if "equivilent" is the right
> word in
> [[
> It is the intention of the Working Group that the interfaces, types,
> faults, and operations defined non-normatively in this WSDL 1.1
> document are equivalent to those normatively defined in WSDL 2.0 by
> the SPARQL Protocol.
> ]]
> next up is DanC:
>           * ACTION DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note,
> 	    contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias

OK, I'll see if I can get this done in the next day or so.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 14:42:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:49 UTC